<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista &#8211; Did Microsoft Copy Mac OS X?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amelia</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8830</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8830</guid>
		<description>When did Ubuntu come out? Isn&#039;t that a fairly new version of LINUX? And just because Mac OS X is Unix based it doesn&#039;t automatically mean it copied Linux. In fact, they are completely different looking. I&#039;ve used both of them, I use Ubuntu at work because my boss won&#039;t let me use my Macintosh and I refuse to use Vista. 

And how many OS&#039;s aren&#039;t Unix based besides Windows? Not that many that I&#039;m aware of. I&#039;m pretty sure I stayed on topic, by the way.

And Macintosh market share is continuing to grow, so I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll be invisible for very long, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did Ubuntu come out? Isn&#8217;t that a fairly new version of LINUX? And just because Mac OS X is Unix based it doesn&#8217;t automatically mean it copied Linux. In fact, they are completely different looking. I&#8217;ve used both of them, I use Ubuntu at work because my boss won&#8217;t let me use my Macintosh and I refuse to use Vista. </p>
<p>And how many OS&#8217;s aren&#8217;t Unix based besides Windows? Not that many that I&#8217;m aware of. I&#8217;m pretty sure I stayed on topic, by the way.</p>
<p>And Macintosh market share is continuing to grow, so I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll be invisible for very long, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Hauer</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>Oh god. Same people touting a system that&#039;s virtually invisible in the real world. Plus the title of the article is.. Did Windows copy Mac. Regardless of what your fantasy world tells you your comment has nothing to do with the article so you get your facts straight and stay on topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god. Same people touting a system that&#8217;s virtually invisible in the real world. Plus the title of the article is.. Did Windows copy Mac. Regardless of what your fantasy world tells you your comment has nothing to do with the article so you get your facts straight and stay on topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazok</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8826</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8826</guid>
		<description>Or, how about, Apple and Windows copy Ubuntu and other Linux distributions, which have had these features far longer.

Get your facts straight next time you want to big up Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, how about, Apple and Windows copy Ubuntu and other Linux distributions, which have had these features far longer.</p>
<p>Get your facts straight next time you want to big up Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8811</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8811</guid>
		<description>Well. Lets just say Im not to shocked M$ have gone back to copying Apple Macintosh. Does anyone remember how much Windows 1.0 2.0 3.0 and 3.1 looking like MacOS?

Sure. Apple is more expensive and PC is more offordable. But why should that matter? You get a PC at 999 US dollers with WAY more hardware then a Apple for a price higher then that. I say big deal. Others will so ZOMG PC OWNZ. 

But lets stop and think here. People claim Apple have copied from companys in the past when they &quot;PAID&quot; for the software to build on. So they didn&#039;t &quot;STEAL&quot; anything.

What has microsoft done to innovate in the world of PC? Not much. Not much at all really. Sure. Windows 95 and all the way up to XP has its own look. But I think its safe to say Windows has always been a rip off of Mac OS. 

M$ didn&#039;t compete with Apple. They bought out all the PC companies. Thats how they got where they are. Apple makes there computers, most of the software AND the OS.

Now, Bill Gates is a good person, giving to charity and all that. But. Windows isn&#039;t and has never been in my opinion a very stable or innovative OS. I used Windows for 7 years, My daughter used it for about 3 years and now we&#039;ve gone and got her a MAC for 2500 bucks. Why? Because her other laptops failed ALL the time.

Sure, Apple is more expensive BUT if you look at it. Which one runs better and last the longest? I&#039;d give the vote to Apple. Why? We have an Macintosh II that still runs fine. Any PC we had bought with Windows 2.0 crashed and burned long ago.

In my opinion, if you want a computer that WILL NOT crash nearly as often as Windows and PC and you don&#039;t want to pay for virus software, tech support, and possibly future maitanance then go for the Apple. You pay more, it works, it lasts.

I think the only real strong point Windows has as an OS over Mac OS X is the games. My daughter still plays Shadowgate (A game relesed for the original Mac) and we have a Nintendo and PS3. Thats for our gaming. I personally think Apple is an original, Innovative and much better quality company. Microsoft is just a Apple and google copy cat who can&#039;t come up with there own ideas. 

So the choice is yours. Pay 999 for a high end windows PC that probably wont last very long or you&#039;ll just have a crap load of problems, or. you can pay more for a little less and have a high quality, good running stable computer that will last.

The choice is yours, you get what you pay for, always remember that!



PS

Sorry for my bad english, I&#039;m actually German :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. Lets just say Im not to shocked M$ have gone back to copying Apple Macintosh. Does anyone remember how much Windows 1.0 2.0 3.0 and 3.1 looking like MacOS?</p>
<p>Sure. Apple is more expensive and PC is more offordable. But why should that matter? You get a PC at 999 US dollers with WAY more hardware then a Apple for a price higher then that. I say big deal. Others will so ZOMG PC OWNZ. </p>
<p>But lets stop and think here. People claim Apple have copied from companys in the past when they &#8220;PAID&#8221; for the software to build on. So they didn&#8217;t &#8220;STEAL&#8221; anything.</p>
<p>What has microsoft done to innovate in the world of PC? Not much. Not much at all really. Sure. Windows 95 and all the way up to XP has its own look. But I think its safe to say Windows has always been a rip off of Mac OS. </p>
<p>M$ didn&#8217;t compete with Apple. They bought out all the PC companies. Thats how they got where they are. Apple makes there computers, most of the software AND the OS.</p>
<p>Now, Bill Gates is a good person, giving to charity and all that. But. Windows isn&#8217;t and has never been in my opinion a very stable or innovative OS. I used Windows for 7 years, My daughter used it for about 3 years and now we&#8217;ve gone and got her a MAC for 2500 bucks. Why? Because her other laptops failed ALL the time.</p>
<p>Sure, Apple is more expensive BUT if you look at it. Which one runs better and last the longest? I&#8217;d give the vote to Apple. Why? We have an Macintosh II that still runs fine. Any PC we had bought with Windows 2.0 crashed and burned long ago.</p>
<p>In my opinion, if you want a computer that WILL NOT crash nearly as often as Windows and PC and you don&#8217;t want to pay for virus software, tech support, and possibly future maitanance then go for the Apple. You pay more, it works, it lasts.</p>
<p>I think the only real strong point Windows has as an OS over Mac OS X is the games. My daughter still plays Shadowgate (A game relesed for the original Mac) and we have a Nintendo and PS3. Thats for our gaming. I personally think Apple is an original, Innovative and much better quality company. Microsoft is just a Apple and google copy cat who can&#8217;t come up with there own ideas. </p>
<p>So the choice is yours. Pay 999 for a high end windows PC that probably wont last very long or you&#8217;ll just have a crap load of problems, or. you can pay more for a little less and have a high quality, good running stable computer that will last.</p>
<p>The choice is yours, you get what you pay for, always remember that!</p>
<p>PS</p>
<p>Sorry for my bad english, I&#8217;m actually German <img src='http://www.bryanhauer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows XP &#171; Tankar från Nepotismens Högborg</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8545</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows XP &#171; Tankar från Nepotismens Högborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8545</guid>
		<description>[...] är en blek kopia av Mac OS X - hälften så dyr, men halva [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] är en blek kopia av Mac OS X &#8211; hälften så dyr, men halva [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac 4ever</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8530</link>
		<dc:creator>mac 4ever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-8530</guid>
		<description>microsoft are getting kind of annoying</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>microsoft are getting kind of annoying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates and Steve Jobs to Share Stage at D: All Things Digital Conference</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates and Steve Jobs to Share Stage at D: All Things Digital Conference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>[...] goes on to say this in response to many claims that Windows Vista copied Mac OS X, &#8220;You can go through and look at who showed any of these things first, if you care about the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goes on to say this in response to many claims that Windows Vista copied Mac OS X, &#8220;You can go through and look at who showed any of these things first, if you care about the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Apple Mac Commercial on Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>New Apple Mac Commercial on Windows Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bryanhauer.com/2007/01/29/windows-vista-did-microsoft-copy-mac-os-x/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>[...] Some other Vista failures can be seen in a previous article I wrote called Windows Vista - Did Microsoft Copy Mac OS X ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some other Vista failures can be seen in a previous article I wrote called Windows Vista &#8211; Did Microsoft Copy Mac OS X ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
